Penerapan Standar Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik Heliantono dan Rekan Cabang Semarang

(Analisis Kritis Berbasis Isa dan Tantangan Implementasinya)

Authors

  • Utami Puji Lestari Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Endang Dwi Wahyuningsih Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Aniqotunnafiah Aniqotunnafiah Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Deviana Indah Pratiwi Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Ravenska Kayla Cahyana Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Putri Naritma Guanwan Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang
  • Luluk Fiya Afiyati Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/profit.v5i3.4941

Keywords:

Audit Quality, Audit Technology, Auditor Competence, ISA Implementation, Semarang Public Accounting Firm

Abstract

. Audit quality is influenced not only by formal compliance with professional standards but also by auditors’ ability to address implementation challenges in dynamic practice settings. This study critically examines the application of International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 315, 330, and 700 at KAP Heliantono dan Rekan Semarang Branch, focusing on both strong compliance practices and implementation gaps that are often overlooked in previous descriptive studies. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis over 13 weeks. The study analyzes how time pressure, client complexity, differences in auditor competence, and dependence on the ATLAS digital application affect audit execution quality. The findings show that the KAP has generally implemented systematic compliance in risk assessment, risk response, and audit reporting. However, several challenges remain, including inconsistent documentation of risk materiality thresholds, potential standardization risks from ATLAS that may limit professional judgment, and the occasional use of verbal management representations instead of formal written documentation in lower-risk engagements. The study provides practical implications for KAP governance, auditor training, and regulatory oversight.

References

Adha, B. M. (2025). Peningkatan kualitas audit: Standar auditing dan sistem pengendalian mutu. Jurnal Sikap, 9(2).

Agoes, S. (2003). Penerapan standar auditing dan pengendalian mutu pada KAP anggota FAMP Indonesia. Media Riset Akuntansi, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v3i3.1796

Agustina, P. A. A., & Dewi, P. P. (2025). Impact of audit standards understanding and technology use on effectiveness. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset, 9(1), 73–100.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (16th ed.). Pearson.

Braun, R. L., & Davis, H. E. (2003). Computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: Analysis and perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(9), 725–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310500488

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cahyono, D. (2025). Implementasi standar audit di KAP dan pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 14(1).

Causholli, M., De Martinis, M., Hay, D., & Knechel, W. R. (2014). Audit market structure, fees and Big 4 premium: Theory and evidence. Accounting & Finance, 54(2), 617–641.

Chang, A., Stefy, S., & Winny, W. (2022). Compliance analysis of the implementation of the public accountant professional code of ethics by public accountants in Indonesia. Sinomics Journal, 1(5), 731–736. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v1i5.82

Coram, P., Ng, J., & Woodliff, D. R. (2004). The effect of risk of misstatement on the propensity to commit reduced audit quality acts under time budget pressure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.159

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Dewi, A. N., & Wilasittha, A. A. (2024). Penerapan aplikasi ATLAS terhadap proses penilaian risiko. Jurnal Ilmiah Metansi, 7(2), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.57093/metansi.v7i2.289

Fadilah, H. N., Irianto, B. S., & Maghfiroh, S. (2026). Implementation of public accountant professional standards (SPAP) through Excel-based ATLAS audit application at public accounting firms. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 6(1), 2270–2274. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6519

Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar audit (SA): Adopsi International Standards on Auditing.

International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2021). International code of ethics for professional accountants (including international independence standards). IFAC.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Knechel, W. R. (2007). The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.005

Maharani, S. (2024). Penerapan standar profesional akuntan publik dalam perencanaan audit KAP XYZ. Jurnal Akademik Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 1(3), 132–142.

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing & assurance services: A systematic approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Mwansa, M. M. (2026). Assessment of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) implementation ZCAS. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 29(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.3.0541

Pasaribu, L., Situmorang, R. Z., & Nazwa, S. (2023). The impact of the implementation of the latest auditing standards on the quality of financial statements. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 3(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v3i2.564

Porter, B. (1993). An empirical study of the audit expectation-performance gap. Accounting and Business Research, 24(93), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1993.9729463

Ratri, M. C. (2020). Penerapan standar profesional audit internal dan kualitas audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v22i1.605

Sonjaya, Y., Prasetianingrum, S., Auliyah, I., & Labo, I. A. (2025). Implementation of public sector accounting systems and standards in improving financial transparency. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v3i1.420

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Tanusdjaja, N. A. (2021). Pengaruh standar auditing dan standar pengendalian mutu terhadap kualitas audit. BIMA, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24912/jpa.v3i1.11664

Wirawan, A. (2025). Prosedur standar audit internasional. BIMA, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.57235/bima.v2i1.5028

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Utami Puji Lestari, Endang Dwi Wahyuningsih, Aniqotunnafiah Aniqotunnafiah, Deviana Indah Pratiwi, Ravenska Kayla Cahyana, Putri Naritma Guanwan, & Luluk Fiya Afiyati. (2026). Penerapan Standar Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik Heliantono dan Rekan Cabang Semarang: (Analisis Kritis Berbasis Isa dan Tantangan Implementasinya). Profit: Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.58192/profit.v5i3.4941

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.