Strengthening Village Governance through a Workshop on Politically-Informed Participatory Development Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/karunia.v4i4.4042Keywords:
Community Empowerment, Musrenbang, Participatory Planning, Political Dimension, Village GovernanceAbstract
Participatory village development planning is often treated as a technical-administrative routine. In practice, however, planning is inseparable from political dynamics that shape who participates, whose interests prevail, and how scarce resources are allocated. This community empowerment program (PKM) in Kedung Udi Village, Trawas District, Mojokerto Regency, East Java, aimed to strengthen village governance by enhancing the capacity of village officials and community representatives to design and facilitate participatory planning while explicitly addressing the political dimension of planning. The main intervention was a workshop conducted on 22 August 2025, preceded by coordination and situational observation. Workshop modules emphasized: (1) planning as a political decision; (2) navigating dual arenas: formal (Musdes/Musrenbang and RPJMDes, RKPDes, APBDes) and informal (elite networks and gatekeeping); (3) multi-level contestation and policy alignment; and (4) practical tools, including power–interest mapping, programmatic agreements, program tagging for alignment with district planning documents, and transparency/anti elite capture mechanisms. The program resulted in improved participant literacy regarding power relations in planning and produced a follow-up action plan oriented toward institutional advocacy, continuous social control, and routine capacity reinforcement through a university and village partnership.
References
Affandi, M. A. (2025). Political dimensions in village development planning: Opportunities, challenges, and institutional strategies (Workshop material). Department of Political Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking participation: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8256-1
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720444
Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7
Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law No. 25 of 2004 on the national development planning system.
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 23 of 2014 on regional government.
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 6 of 2014 on villages.
United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Governance for sustainable development. UNDP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karunia: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
