Analisis Discourse Network di China, India, dan Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i3.5455Keywords:
Discourse Network Analysis, Discourse Networks, Disinformation, Foreign Intervention, SecuritizationAbstract
This study analyzes actors and discourse networks surrounding disinformation and foreign intervention in Indonesia, India, and China using the Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) approach. The study aims to identify dominant actors, map relationships among actors, and examine differences in discourse structures within distinct political and public-space contexts. The research data consist of 200 national and international news articles discussing disinformation and foreign intervention, which were coded based on actors, issues, and their positions toward specific discourse claims. The findings indicate that government actors are the most dominant and occupy central positions within the discourse networks across the three countries. Governments play a significant role in framing disinformation and foreign intervention as security issues and threats to political stability and information sovereignty. Technology companies and media organizations function as amplifiers and intermediaries by connecting different groups of actors and facilitating the dissemination of competing narratives. Meanwhile, civil society organizations, academics, fact-checking organizations, and independent media form counter-discourse clusters that challenge official government narratives, particularly in Indonesia and India. In China, counter-discourse clusters tend to be smaller and more peripheral due to limitations in public discursive space. These findings demonstrate that political structures and the openness of public space significantly influence the configuration and dynamics of discourse networks surrounding disinformation and foreign intervention in each country.y.
References
Adler, E. (2013). Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions, and debates. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n5
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Arayankalam, J., & Krishnan, S. (2021). Foreign disinformation, social media, and offline violence: An agenda-building perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120661
Balzacq, T. (2011). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868508
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
Boettcher, W. A., & Cobb, M. D. (2019). Theories of international relations. Oxford University Press.
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Eriyanto, & Ali, D. J. (2020). Discourse network analysis dalam studi kebijakan publik.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
Haunss, S., & Leifeld, P. (2020). Network analysis and political discourse. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.954
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: A discourse network analysis of German pension politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
Leifeld, P. (2016). Discourse network analysis: Policy debates as dynamic networks. In J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, & M. Lubell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.25
Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2012). Political discourse networks and conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097553
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071873045
Putra, B. A. (2024). Fake news and disinformation in Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Communication, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1380944
Repnikova, M. (2017). Media politics in China: Improvising power under authoritarianism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164474
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






