Efek Heroism dalam Komunikasi Politik: Konstruksi Citra Aktor Politik Melalui Insiden Berisiko Tinggi di Wilayah Konflik Kepentingan: Efek Heroism dalam Komunikasi Politik: Konstruksi Citra Aktor Politik Melalui Insiden Berisiko Tinggi di Wilayah Konflik Kepentingan

Nabila Zahia Putri Syahriar; Atika Puspita Marzaman

doi:10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4919

Authors

Nabila Zahia Putri Syahriar Universitas Hasanuddin
Atika Puspita Marzaman Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4919

Keywords:

Conflict Of Interests, Heroism, International Security, Political Actor Image, Political Communication

Abstract

This study examines the effect of heroism in political communication as a strategy for constructing the image of political actors through high-risk incidents in areas of conflicting interests within the framework of international security studies. Political heroism is utilized to build legitimacy, strengthen political influence, and shape public perceptions of state and non-state actors amid conflicts, wars, and security crises. Using a qualitative approach through literature review and political communication analysis, this research explores how mass media and public diplomacy contribute to the formation of narratives of courage, leadership, and sacrifice attached to certain political figures. The findings indicate that the construction of a heroic image can enhance political support and legitimize power at both domestic and international levels, particularly in issues related to national security and geopolitical conflicts. However, the strategy of heroism also has the potential to manipulate public opinion, intensify excessive nationalism, and legitimize controversial political actions within international relations. Therefore, heroism in political communication functions as a strategic instrument that significantly influences the dynamics of global security and political stability.

References

Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. (2014). Heroic leadership: An influence taxonomy of 100 exceptional individuals. Routledge.

Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bidewell, T., Deligianni, A., Elmas, T., Llewellyn, C., & Ross, B. (2026). Gendered communication patterns of political elites on Truth Social. Political Communication Studies.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Revised ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Frermann, L., Li, J., Khanehzar, S., & Mikolajczak, G. (2023). Conflicts, villains, resolutions: Towards models of narrative media framing. Proceedings of the Computational Communication Research Conference.

Homolar, A. (2022). A call to arms: Hero–villain narratives in US security discourse. Security Dialogue, 53(4), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211005897

Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.

McNair, B. (2018). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft power: The means to success in world politics (Updated ed.). PublicAffairs.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Pratiwi, A. (2025). Analyzing fake heroism in Indonesian government communication strategies amid controversial policies. Cakra Communico: Journal of Communication Science, 2(2), 115–129.

Steele, B. J., & Subotić, J. (2024). Icons and ontological (in)security. European Journal of International Security, 9(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2023.22

Zed, M. (2018). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Efek Heroism dalam Komunikasi Politik: Konstruksi Citra Aktor Politik Melalui Insiden Berisiko Tinggi di Wilayah Konflik Kepentingan