Kritik Kemanusiaan Sebagai Kekerasan Struktural: Rekonstruksi Filsafat Perdamian Johan Galtung Dalam Horizon Positive Peace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4578Keywords:
Humanitarian Crisis, Johan Galtung, Philosophy of Peace, Positive Peace, Structural ViolenceAbstract
Contemporary humanitarian crises can no longer be understood merely as the result of physical violence or natural disasters, but rather as manifestations of systemic injustices embedded within social, economic, and political structures. This study aims to analyze humanitarian crises through Johan Galtung’s concept of structural violence and to reconstruct his philosophy of peace within the horizon of positive peace. Employing a qualitative approach with a critical-philosophical library research method, the study utilizes hermeneutic and critical-interpretative analysis of Galtung’s major works, particularly his concepts of structural violence, cultural violence, and positive peace, as well as their relevance to contemporary social realities. The findings reveal that humanitarian crises are rooted in structural mechanisms that systematically hinder the realization of human potential through economic inequality, social marginalization, administrative exclusion, and culturally legitimized discriminatory practices. The study further demonstrates that the notion of negative peace, understood merely as the absence of armed conflict, is insufficient to explain the persistent and latent forms of human suffering. Consequently, the reconstruction of Galtung’s philosophy of peace points toward an understanding of positive peace as a condition characterized by social justice, equitable distribution of resources, recognition of human dignity, and sustainable structural and cultural transformation. This article therefore offers a critical interpretation of the relationship between humanitarian crises and structural violence while reaffirming the relevance of Galtung’s philosophy of peace for fostering a more just, inclusive, and humane social order.
References
Buber, M., & Kaufmann, W. (1970). I And Thou. Free Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-9yYEAAAQBAJ
Burton, C. W., Gilpin, C. E., & Draughon Moret, J. (2021). Structural violence: A concept analysis to inform nursing science and practice. Nursing Forum, 56(2), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12535
Christensen, M.-B., Hallum, C., Maitland, A., Parrinello, Q., Putaturo, C., Abed, D., Brown, C., Kamande, A., Lawson, M., & Ruiz, S. (2023). Survival of the Richest: How we must tax the super-rich now to fight inequality. Oxfam. https://doi.org/10.21201/2023.621477
Clausen, M.-L. (2026). Violent Peacemaking: The Violence Within Liberal Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2026.2623686
Docherty, N., & Biega, A. J. (2022). (Re)Politicizing Digital Well-Being: Beyond User Engagements. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2203.08199
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed). Continuum.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. SAGE.
Galtung, J., & Baronov, D. (2004). Transcend and Transform: An Introduction to Conflict Work. Paradigm Publishers.
Institute for Economics & Peace. (2025). Global Peace Index 2025. Sydney, Australia: Institute for Economics & Peace.
Honneth, A., & Anderson, J. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. MIT Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=VgdFeCSlJcoC
Kasim, A., Bakri, R., Supriyadi, S., Intan Purnamasari, A., & Rizal, M. (2024). Kebijakan Vaksinasi Covid-19 dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 31(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss1.art2
Kramsch, C. (2020). Language as Symbolic Power (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869386
Le, T.-H., Bui, M.-T., & Uddin, G. S. (2022). Economic and social impacts of conflict: A cross-country analysis. Economic Modelling, 115, 105980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105980
Lubis, I., Siregar, T., Lubis, D. I. S., Adawiyah, R., & Lubis, A. H. (2025). Integrasi Hukum Adat dalam Sistem Hukum Agraria Nasional: Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Pengakuan Hak Ulayat. Tunas Agraria, 8(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i2.401
Millar, G. (2021). Ambition and ambivalence: Reconsidering positive peace as a trans-scalar peace system. Journal of Peace Research, 58(4), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320941909
Patterson, J. J. (2021). More than planning: Diversity and drivers of institutional adaptation under climate change in 96 major cities. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102279
Perry, S. D. (2022). Value Consistency in Peace Journalism: Opposing Structural and Cultural Violence through Prodding for Positive Peace. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2131787
Institute for Economics & Peace. (2024). Positive Peace Report 2024: Analysing the factors that build, predict and sustain peace. Sydney, Australia: Institute for Economics & Peace. (2024, April 10). https://reliefweb.int/report/world/positive-peace-report-2024-analysing-factors-build-predict-and-sustain-peace
Pratama, I. N., Saputra, A., & Syaputra, S. K. (2025). Ketimpangan Sosial dan Kemiskinan: Analisis Literatur Sistematis terhadap Perspektif Ekonomi dan Sosial. Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (Rapik), 5(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.47134/rapik.v5i1.80
Richmond, O. (2012). A Post-Liberal Peace (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810262
Sempiga, O. (2017). Peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peacebuilding: Towards positive peace in a society that endured conflict. 7, 185–200.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Alfred Knopf. http://www.amazon.com/Development-as-Freedom-Amartya-Sen/dp/0385720270/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1310743622&sr=1-1
Strömbom, L., & Bramsen, I. (2022a). Agonistic peace: Advancing knowledge on institutional dynamics and relational transformation. Third World Quarterly, 43(6), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2054797
Webel, J. G. & C. (2018). Handbook Studi Perdamaian dan Konflik. Nusamedia.
Wennmann, A. (2011). Economic dimensions of armed groups: Profiling the financing, costs, and agendas and their implications for mediated engagements. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(882), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383111000361
Windhu, I. M. (1992). Kekuasaan & Kekerasan Menurut Johan Galtung. Kanisius. (Yogyakarta). //e-lib.stfsp.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fid%3D4072%26p%3Dshow_detail%26utm_source%3.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






