Analisis Etika Komunikasi Guru dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran di Kelas 1 SD N 11 Palangka

Authors

  • Apri E.Simamora Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Emya.P Br Bangun Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Marsella Sinaga Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Rebecca C.Siregar Universitas Palangka Raya
  • M.Faisal Riza Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Tomo Tomo Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4486

Keywords:

Communication Ethics, Educational Communication, Elementary Schools, Learning Interactions, Teachers

Abstract

This study aims to determine the communication ethics of teachers in learning interactions in grade 1 of Palangka State Elementary School 11. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques in the form of interviews and observations. The resource person in this study was a grade 1 teacher of Palangka State Elementary School 11, namely Mrs. Franciska Julia. The results of the study indicate that teacher communication ethics have an important role in creating effective and comfortable learning for students. Teachers implement good communication through the use of polite language, two-way communication, providing opportunities for students to express opinions, the ability to understand student characters, and emotional control in dealing with various situations in the classroom. In addition, teachers also face several communication barriers, such as the use of language that students do not understand and the influence of digitalization developments on student behavior. In overcoming these obstacles, teachers use a patient, simple, and communicative approach so that students can understand the learning well. This study shows that teacher communication ethics greatly influences learning comfort, character formation, and student learning success in elementary schools.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.

Dewantara, K. H. (1962). Pendidikan. Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.

Dewi, L. P. R., & Suardana, I. (2023). Communication patterns in educational settings. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik.

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Etika komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to communication studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837382

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gunawan, I. (2017). Manajemen kelas: Teori dan peningkatan mutu pembelajaran. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hamalik, O. (2013). Proses belajar mengajar. Bumi Aksara.

Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7

Hidayat, S. (2012). Komunikasi pendidikan. Pustaka Setia.

Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024

Mulyana, D. (2005). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. (2015). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17

Postholm, M. B. (2012). Classroom management: What does research tell us? European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.389

Rakhmat, J. (2011). Psikologi komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sardiman, A. M. (2014). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Rajawali Pers.

Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Prenadamedia Group.

Suyanto, S., & Jamaluddin, J. (2021). Etika komunikasi guru dalam pembelajaran daring dan luring di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v2i1.188

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Apri E.Simamora, Emya.P Br Bangun, Marsella Sinaga, Rebecca C.Siregar, M.Faisal Riza, & Tomo Tomo. (2026). Analisis Etika Komunikasi Guru dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran di Kelas 1 SD N 11 Palangka . Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4486