Kepercayaan Antarbudaya di Era Geo-Sibernetik

Praktik Komunikasi Digital Asisten Virtual Indonesia

Authors

  • Ridha Handayani Universitas Paramadina
  • Mulharnetti Syas Universitas Paramadina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4445

Keywords:

Cultural Intelligence, Digital Trust, Geo-Cybernetic, Intercultural Communication, Virtual Assistant

Abstract

In the geo-cybernetic era, cross-cultural digital interactions form the foundation of trust building in remote professional collaboration. Virtual assistants serving international clients through digital platforms represent complex intercultural communication practices. Differences in context, communication styles, and expectations may trigger miscommunication and erode trust. This study aims to examine how virtual assistants construct intercultural trust in professional communication practices with international clients. It is grounded in Hall's high-context versus low-context culture theory, Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Spitzberg and Changnon's intercultural communication competence, Ting-Toomey's Face-Negotiation Theory, and the contemporary digital trust framework. This research employs a constructivist paradigm, qualitative approach, and descriptive analysis method. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews with five experienced Indonesian virtual assistants, and document analysis. Data were thematically analyzed to identify communication strategies, adaptation mechanisms, and the role of platform transparency in trust formation. Intercoder reliability was established using two independent coders, yielding Cohen's Kappa κ = 0.98, Krippendorff's Alpha α = 0.98, and Percentage Agreement = 98.7%. The results indicate that higher levels of cultural intelligence, the ability to maintain clients' face, the use of context-sensitive phrasing, explicit clarification routines, and the selection of appropriate communication media enhance communication effectiveness and trust perception. Platform attributes moderate this relationship by reinforcing trust. These findings are consistent with Hall's framework and contemporary digital trust models emphasizing system transparency and reliability.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000113

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640

Fiers, F. (2024). Resilience in the gig economy: Digital skills in online freelancing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae014

Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451

Gussek, L., Grabbe, A., & Wiesche, M. (2023). Challenges of IT freelancers on digital labor platforms: A topic model approach. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00675-y

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.

Hofstede, G. (1999). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.8540322

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., Brünker, F., Hofeditz, L., Ross, B., & Frick, N. R. J. (2021). Understanding collaboration with virtual assistants: The role of social identity and the extended self. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00672-x

Oesterreich, T. D., Anton, E., Hettler, F. M., & Teuteberg, F. (2025). What drives individuals' trusting intention in digital platforms? An exploratory meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 75(4), 3615–3667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00477-2

Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence (pp. 2–52). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872987.n1

Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). A face negotiation theory. In Theory and Intercultural Communication (pp. 47–92). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252955-8

Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In Theorizing About Intercultural Communication (pp. 71–92). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252955-8

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Ridha Handayani, & Mulharnetti Syas. (2026). Kepercayaan Antarbudaya di Era Geo-Sibernetik: Praktik Komunikasi Digital Asisten Virtual Indonesia. Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v5i2.4445