Penilaian Risiko Keterlambatan Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal Bg. APC XVIII di PT. Gapura Shipyard

Authors

  • Akhmad Miftahul Huda Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
  • Minto Basuki Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/ocean.v2i3.1213

Abstract

. In the shipbuilding industry, the repair process is a series of jobs that require a relatively short time. Delays in repairs can occur due to weak management and also caused by less than optimal empowerment of human resources. This study aims to identify the risks found in four divisions, namely the Production Division, Warehouse Division, Finance Division and Purchasing Division. The study found 31 risk events. Determining the value of each risk is carried out using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis method. There were 13 risks that had the highest Risk Priority Number, namely the length of approval for requests for goods (RPN = 522.88), delays in payment processes by customers (RPN = 504.64), requests for additional work from the owner (RPN = 477.128), fluctuations in the number of manpower (RPN = 454.08), Changes in material use related to the availability of materials in the warehouse (RPN = 411.768), Changes in material calculations related to design (RPN = 389.017), Length of decision making by the owner (RPN = 388.36), Long material delivery process (RPN = 388.36), Insufficient stock material (RPN = 357,588), Writing the amount on the Request for Goods Bill is not detailed (RPN = 357.71), Lack of availability of stock material (RPN = 349,524), Making and submitting late payment requests (RPN = 316.8), Placement of materials that are less efficient (RPN = 296.8) Risk mitigation is carried out using the Fault Tree Analysis method to find the main cause / basic event of each risk. And the mitigation step that needs to be done is by making changes to the warehouse layout. If the layout design of the warehouse is changed to be more efficient it will speed up the material retrieval process which has an impact on the ship repair process time.

 

References

Adinda, F. M. 2014. Analisa Keterlambatan Proyek Menggunakan Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) (Studi Kasus Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Program Studi Teknik Industri Tahap II Universitas Brawijaya Malang).

Ardianto, R., & Baroroh, I. 2022. Identifikasi Risiko Keterlambatan Reparasi Kapal Kayu Menggunakan Metode House of Risk. Jurnal Jalasena.

Arif , R., & Farah , F. 2021. Penggunaan Metode FMECA (Failure Modes Effect Critically Analysis) dalam Identifikasi Titik Kritis di Industri Makanan. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian 31 (1) : 110 - 119.

Choirunisa, B., & Basuki , M. 2012. Analisa Risiko Proses Pembangunan Kapal Baru 3.500 LTDW White Product Oil Tanker - Pertamina di PT. Dumas Tanjung Perak Surabaya. Jurnal Neptunus, Volume 18, Nomor 2, pp. 97 - 109, Edisi Juli 2012, Fakultas Teknik UHT.

Laura, K. P., Imam, R., & Yeyes, M. 2018. Penjadwalan Berdasarkan Analisis Faktor - Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Proyek Reparasi Kapal : Studi Kasus MV Blossom. Jurnal Teknik ITS Vol 7 No 1.

Murali, S., & Yau Wen, S. 2007 Causes and Effects of Delays in Malaysian Construction Industry. International Journal of Projects Management. Vol 25, hal 517 - 526.

Rivai, V., & Ismail, R. 2013. Definisi Risiko. Islamic Risk Management For Islamic Bank.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-14

How to Cite

Akhmad Miftahul Huda, & Minto Basuki. (2023). Penilaian Risiko Keterlambatan Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal Bg. APC XVIII di PT. Gapura Shipyard . Ocean Engineering : Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Dan Teknologi Maritim, 2(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.58192/ocean.v2i3.1213