Meningkatkan Akurasi Layanan dan Mengurangi Penundaan dengan ASD Tug MV. Ace Guard: Analisis Studi Kasus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/ocean.v2i2.1057Keywords:
ASD delay system, MV. Ace Guard, service operation efficiencyAbstract
This research article examines the process of delaying service at West Opel through observations made while working on board the ship. This study focuses on two main factors that affect the efficiency of the towage process: the delay in maneuvering the ship and the time it takes. The observations highlight the impact of the power limitations of conventional tugs compared to ASD tug systems, particularly MVs. Ace Guard. This finding reveals that the insufficient power of a conventional vessel impedes the smooth maneuverability of the vessel, so that the ASD tug has to adjust its power to match that of a conventional tug and maintain the correct position while the vessel departs. In addition, this study emphasizes the significant duration of time involved in the towage process, taking into account the coordination between ASD tugs and conventional tugs. This research concludes that these factors contribute to a slower and more time consuming procrastination process. The case studies presented provide valuable insights for optimizing and increasing the efficiency of service operations in a similar maritime environment.
References
Xu, D., Zhang, X., & Yin, Y. (2016, July). The computer simulation study of tug pushing operation system. In 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (pp. 2074-2080). IEEE.
Gray, D. L., & Reynolds, E. (2001). Engineering methodologies used in the preparation of escort tug requirements for the ports of San Francisco and Los Angeles/Long Beach. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 38(01), 51-64.
Notteboom, T. E. (2004). Container shipping and ports: an overview. Review of network economics, 3(2).
Kamble, S. S., Raoot, A. D., & Khanapuri, V. B. (2010). Improving port efficiency: a comparative study of selected ports in India. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 2(4), 444-470.
da Silva Nogueira, J. W. R. M., & Rodrigues, M. C. S. (2015). Effective communication in teamwork in health a challenge for patient safety. Cogitare Enfermagem, 20(3), 630-4.
Zhang, S., Wu, Q., Liu, J., He, Y., & Li, S. (2023). Twin-screw ASD tug maneuvering prediction based on integrated CFD and empirical methods. Ocean Engineering, 269, 113489.
Piaggio, B., Viviani, M., Martelli, M., & Figari, M. (2022). Z-Drive Escort Tug manoeuvrability model and simulation, Part II: A full-scale validation. Ocean Engineering, 259, 111881.
Xu, W., Willecke, A., Wegner, M., Wolf, L., & Kapitza, R. (2019, June). Autonomous maneuver coordination via vehicular communication. In 2019 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) (pp. 70-77). IEEE.
Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative content analysis. In Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer (Vol. 11, pp. 39-62). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Tsiulin, S., Reinau, K. H., Hilmola, O. P., Goryaev, N., & Karam, A. (2020). Blockchain-based applications in shipping and port management: a literature review towards defining key conceptual frameworks. Review of International Business and Strategy, 30(2), 201-224.
Moghaddam, B. M., & Chhabra, R. (2021). On the guidance, navigation and control of in-orbit space robotic missions: A survey and prospective vision. Acta Astronautica, 184, 70-100.
Adland, R., Cariou, P., & Wolff, F. C. (2019). When energy efficiency is secondary: The case of Offshore Support Vessels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 114-126.
Gray, W. O., Waters, J. K., Blume, A. L., & Landsburg, A. C. (2003). Channel design and vessel maneuverability: next steps. Marine technology and SNAME news, 40(02), 93-105.
Koznowski, W., & Łebkowski, A. (2022). Analysis of Hull Shape Impact on Energy Consumption in an Electric Port Tugboat. Energies, 15(1), 339.
Cheng, Y. L., Sen, H. C., Natarajan, K., Teo, C. P., & Tan, K. C. (2005). Dispatching automated guided vehicles in a container terminal. Supply chain optimization, 355-389.
Gibbs, D., Rigot-Muller, P., Mangan, J., & Lalwani, C. (2014). The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions. Energy Policy, 64, 337-348.
