Model Think Pair Share dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis terhadap Implementasi dan Efektivitasnya dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa

Authors

  • Putu Anggi Agustini Astari Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Putu Wisna Ariawan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/insdun.v5i2.4336

Keywords:

Mathematics Learning, Problem Solving, PRISMA, Systematic Literature Review, Think Pair Share

Abstract

The enhancement of student's mathematics problem-solving abilities can be achieved through the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) model, a cooperative learning approach commonly used in mathematics education. However, research on the role of Think Pair Share in mathematics learning is still relatively limited. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Think Pair Share model in improving students' ability to solve mathematical problems. This study uses a systematic literature review method following the PRISMA guidelines, with literature searches conducted through the Scopus database from 2016-2026 using relevant keywords. After the selection process, seven articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The analysis results show that the Think Pair Share model consistently demonstrates the ability to improve learning outcomes, participation, confidence, and mathematical problem-solving skills of students. The effectiveness of this model can be attributed to its ability to encourage students to think actively, speak, and share mathematical concepts. Additionally, the integration of Think Pair Share with technology can enhance the quality of learning. The results of this study indicate that Think Pair Share is an effective learning model for improving students' ability to solve mathematical problems, and therefore, this model can be considered for inclusion in mathematics curricula to improve the quality of mathematics learning more broadly.

References

Allen, C. E., Froustet, M. E., LeBlanc, J. F., Payne, J. N., Priest, A., Reed, J. F., Worth, J. E., Thomason, G. M., Robinson, B., & Payne, J. N. (2020). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 29(5), 59. https://doi.org/10.5951/at.29.5.0059

Alsmadi, M. A., Tabieh, A. A. S., Alsaifi, R. M., & Al-Nawaiseh, S. J. (2023). The Effect of the Collaborative Discussion Strategy Think-Pair-Share on Developing Students’ Skills in solving Engineering Mathematical Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1123

Anggraini, N. A., Ningsih, E. F., Choirudin, C., Darmayanti, R., & Triyanto, D. (2022). Application of the AIR learning model using song media to improve students’ mathematical representational ability. AMCA Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajst.v2i1.264

Anupan, A. (2024). The Influence of an Interactive Learning Model Based on the PDEODE Strategy with Cloud Technology on Students’ Self-Regulation in Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(7), 936–944. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.7.2120

Azizah, T., Fauzan, A., & Harisman, Y. (2022). Flipped Classroom Type Peer Instruction-Based Learning Based on A Website to Improve Student’s Problem Solving. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p325-348

Balacuit, I. C. P., Nabua, E. B., & Saludares, J. R. G. (2025). Examining Conceptual Understanding and Engagement in Mathematics Students. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v8i1.2535

Ballon, E. M. M., Gomez, F. L. R., Castro, A. E. L. F., & Linares, M. R. F. C. (2024). Evaluating problem-solving and procedural skills of first-year students in a Peruvian higher education institution. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2396. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14154

Bamiro, A. O. (2015). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564754

Castillo, D., Carrión, J., Chamba, C., Jiménez-Gaona, Y., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2025). Didactic strategies for conceptual understanding and motivation in university mathematics: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1536470

Chinofunga, M. D., Chigeza, P., & Taylor, S. (2025). How can procedural flowcharts support the development of mathematics problem-solving skills? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37(1), 85–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00483-3

Cresswell, C., & Speelman, C. P. (2020). Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236153

Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2022). Teacher-student interactions for enhanced learning in upper secondary mathematics classroom. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(2), 507. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22152

Ersoy, E., & Bal-Incebacak, B. (2017). The Evaluation of the Problem Solving in Mathematics Course According to Student Views. ITM Web of Conferences, 13, 1012. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171301012

Faudzan, N. F., Mudrikah, A., & Rahman, S. A. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik dan Respon Peserta Didik terhadap Pembelajaran Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1705

Fitriani, F., Herman, T., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Considering the Mathematical Resilience in Analyzing Students’ Problem-Solving Ability through Learning Model Experimentation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16113a

Foster, C. (2023). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: From domain-general strategies to domain-specific tactics. The Curriculum Journal, 34(4), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.213

Ginting, A. C., Siagian, P., & Surya, E. (2023). Development of Learning Materials through CTL with Karo Culture Context to Improve Students’ Problem Solving Ability. PARADIKMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 16(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v16i1.42568

Hansuk, S., Jansoda, S., & Poonputta, A. (2024). Utilizing Integrated Think-Pair-Share and SSCS Techniques to Enhance Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematical Set among 10th Grade Students. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(4), 295. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n4p295

Herbert, S. (2021). Overcoming Challenges in Assessing Mathematical Reasoning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(8), 17–30.

Husna, A., & Hanggara, Y. (2022). Analyzing Students’ Problem-Solving Ability Based on Mathematics Disposition During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v6i1.21062

Jiang, R., Star, J. R., Hästö, P., Li, L., Liu, R., Tuomela, D., Prieto, N. J., Palkki, R., Abánades, M. Á., & Pejlare, J. (2023). Which One Is the “Best”: a Cross-national Comparative Study of Students’ Strategy Evaluation in Equation Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1127–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10282-6

Jonsson, B., Granberg, C., & Lithner, J. (2020). Gaining Mathematical Understanding: The Effects of Creative Mathematical Reasoning and Cognitive Proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574366

Keleş, T., & Yazgan, Y. (2025). The link between non-routine problem solving success levels and strategic flexibility of gifted fourth-grade students. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 16). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1614829

Khasawneh, A. A., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Almahmoud, S. A. (2023). The impact of mathematics learning environment supported by error-analysis activities on classroom interaction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2227. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12951

Khotimah, R. P., Adnan, M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Murtiyasa, B. (2021). Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education in Indonesia: a Literature Review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1), 12028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012028

Kurjum, M., Muhid, A., & Thohir, M. (2020). Think-pair-share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in islamic studies: Is it effective? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28762

Mariamah, M., Muslim, M., Gunawan, G., Hidayat, A., & Suratman. (2021). The Effectiveness of Think Pair Share (TPS) Integrated Problem-Solving Learning of Students’ Mathematic Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 12073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012073

Møgelvang, A., & Nyléhn, J. (2023). Co-operative Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics and Science Education: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(6), 1935–1959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10331-0

Murphy, S., & Ingram, N. (2023). A scoping review of research into mathematics classroom practices and affect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104235

Nafisah, S. L., Suwartono, T., Noviyanti, E., & Rahmi, A. C. S. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Participation in English Language Classes Using The “Think Pair Share” Cooperative Learning Model. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 6(1), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5810

Naidoo, J., & Hajaree, S. (2021). Exploring the perceptions of Grade 5 learners about the use of videos and PowerPoint presentations when learning fractions in mathematics. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v11i1.846

Nguyen, H. A., Guo, Y., Stamper, J., & McLaren, B. M. (2020). Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Flexibility in Non-routine Mathematics. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2020, 12164, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_74

OECD. (2012). Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pamungkas, A. Y., Sugiman, S., & Setyaningsih, N. (2021). Mathematics Learning Achievement: Discovery Learning Collaboration Think Pair Share Viewed From Reasoning. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3177

Popova, Y., Abdualiyeva, M., Torebek, Y., Yelshibekov, N., & Omashova, G. (2022). Improving the effectiveness of senior graders’ education based on the development of mathematical intuition and logic: Kazakhstan’s experience. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.986093

Prediger, S., Erath, K., Quabeck, K., & Stahnke, R. (2024). Effects of Interaction Qualities Beyond Task Quality: Disentangling Instructional Support and Cognitive Demands. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10389-4

Rahayu, R., Azzahra, A., Handoko, H., Muslihudin, M., & Saebah, N. (2023). The Effect of the Application of the Make-a-Match Model on the Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts and Student Learning Activity. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(8), 2101–2111. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.645

Ribut, O. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share (TPS) Pada Prestasi matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v1i1.1

Rifa’i, A., & Lestari, H. P. (2018). The effect of Think Pair Share (TPS) using scientific approach on students’ self-confidence and mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 12084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012084

S, V. P., Chakraborty, A., & Kar, A. K. (2024). How to Undertake an Impactful Literature Review: Understanding Review Approaches and Guidelines for High-impact Systematic Literature Reviews. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 13(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779241227654

Salsabila, E. (2019). Influence of prerequisite concepts understanding and mathematical communication skills toward student’s mathematical proving ability. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.25067

Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Think-Pair-Share and Roundtable: Two Cooperative Learning Structures to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills of 4th Graders. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.274

Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2024). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities through Think Pair Share Learning Using Autograph. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15583

Suriyakat, W., Siripattanakunkajorn, S., & Nansaarng, S. (2025). The Effects of Integrating Think-Pair-Share Technique and Immediate Assessment Technology on Engagement and Academic Achievement in Fundamental Mathematics among Higher Education Students. 2025 10th International STEM Education Conference (ISTEM-Ed), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed65612.2025.11129458

Trisnadewi, N. P. P., Sariyasa, S., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2025). The Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Learning Model in Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Fifth-Grade Elementary Students: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(3), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijemt.v3i3.8209

Tytler, R., Anderson, J., & Williams, G. (2023). Exploring a framework for integrated STEM: challenges and benefits for promoting engagement in learning mathematics. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01519-x

Umam, K., Suswandari, S., Asiah, N., Wibowo, I. T., & Rohim, S. (2017). The effect of think-pair-share cooperative learning model assisted with ICT on mathematical problem solving ability among junior high school students. ICCE 2017 - 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, 94–98.

Zain, B. P., & Ahmad, R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Motivasi dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3668–3676. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1408

Zhao, J., Song, T., Song, X., & Bai, Y. (2022). Analysis on the linguistic features of conflict discourse in mathematical cooperation problem solving in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945909

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Putu Anggi Agustini Astari, I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan, & I Putu Wisna Ariawan. (2026). Model Think Pair Share dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis terhadap Implementasi dan Efektivitasnya dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. Inspirasi Dunia: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 5(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.58192/insdun.v5i2.4336