CHARACTERS' IMPOLITENESS IN PARANORMAN MOVIE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/insdun.v2i1.427Keywords:
impoliteness, responses, paranormanAbstract
This research used a qualitative method. The data were utterances uttered by characters in the Paranorman movie, whereas the contexts were dialogues. The research used the Paranorman movie script and movie as sources. The researcher was the primary instrument, with the data sheet as a secondary. The researcher collected data through analyzing documents by note-taking. The data were analyzed using a reference. The results of the research are as follows. First, other characters in Paranorman use four types of impoliteness strategies. They are bald on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, and sarcasm. Second, each impoliteness strategy has its own representation. Direct, clear, and unambiguous statements are used to express impoliteness. Positive impoliteness occurs as disassociating from others, calling the other names, and using of taboo words. Negative impoliteness occurs as condescending, scorning, or ridiculing the other. Sarcasm or mock politeness is only performed by using insincere politeness. This is the most representation. Third, the movie shows three responses: no response, accepting, and countering the face attack. Countering a face attack has two parts: offensive and defensive.
References
Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bousfield, D., and Miriam L. 2008. Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, J. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp. 349-367.
Culpeper, J., Derek B., and Anne W. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects”, http://id.scribd.com/doc/20554112/Culpeper-Impoliteness-Revisited. Retrieved on February 2, 2015.
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. New York: Cambridge University Press,. Web
Pramujiono, Agung. "Strategi Ketidaksantunan dalam Wacana Dialog di Televisi." KOLITA : Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya Tingkat Internasional. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Unika Atma Jaya, 2011. 183. Document.
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. 2013. "Reinterpretasi Ketidaksantunan Pragmatik." Jurnal Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra Volume 25.1 (2013): 58. Document.