Analysis of the Influence of Tax Burden and Profitability on CSR Disclosure with Good Corporate Governance Mediation

Authors

  • Devani Heryaman Putri Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Acep Komara Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Ahmad Syifaudin Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v4i4.5048

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Fixed Effect Model, Good Corporate Governance, Panel Data Regression, Return on Assets, Tax Burden

Abstract

The purpose and objective of this study is to analyze the effect of tax burden and company profitability, measured by return on assets (ROA), on corporate social responsibility (CSR disclosure), and to examine the role of good corporate governance (GCG) as a mediating variable in construction and property companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2024. This study uses a quantitative method with panel data analyzed using panel data regression. The model selection was conducted through the Chow test, the Lagrange multiplier (LM) test, and the Hausman test, which showed that the fixed effect model (FEM) was the most appropriate model. To overcome the problem of heteroscedasticity, the estimation was performed using clustered robust standard error. The mediation analysis was performed using the Sobel test and the bootstrap method with 5,000 replications. The results show that tax burden and profitability (ROA) have a negative and significant effect on CSR disclosure. This indicates that the higher the tax burden and profitability of a company, the lower the level of CSR disclosure tends to be. Meanwhile, good corporate governance does not have a significant effect on CSR disclosure. The results of mediation tests, both through the Sobel test and bootstrap, show that GCG does not act as a mediating variable in the relationship between tax burden and profitability on CSR disclosure. These results indicate that in the construction and property sector during the research period, CSR disclosure is more directly influenced by tax burden and profitability factors than by corporate governance mechanisms as mediating variables.

References

Cahan, S. F., De Villiers, C., Jeter, D. C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2016). Are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross-country evidence. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 579–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1064009

Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Board structure to enhance social responsibility development: A qualitative comparative analysis of US companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 524–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1425

Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The Accounting Review, 91(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51224

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226

Firmansyah, A., & Estutik, R. S. (2020). Environmental responsibility performance, corporate social responsibility disclosure, tax aggressiveness: Does corporate governance have a role? Journal of Governance and Regulation, 9(4), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv9i4art1

Gandullia, L., & Piserà, S. (2020). Do income taxes affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from European-listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1862

Guenther, D. A., Njoroge, K., & Williams, B. M. (2020). Allocation of internal cash flow when firms pay less tax. The Accounting Review, 95(5), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52623

Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025–2059. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50544

Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010

Kurniawati, L., Kholis, N., & Mujiyati, M. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting the implementation of social and environmental responsibility disclosure in property, real estate, and construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2015–2020. Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v7i2.20040

Laguir, I., Staglianò, R., & Elbaz, J. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 662–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.059

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006

Lu, Y., Liu, R., Cao, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Tax burden and corporate investment efficiency. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031747

Mutairi, A. M. S. A., & Bakar, S. (2023). Firm performance, disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the effect of corporate reputation and corporate governance: A cross-country analysis. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 19, 740–761. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.71

Muthia, F., & Isnurhadi, I. (2019). Social disclosure and profitability: Study in Indonesian companies. Bridges: Scientific Journal of Management, 16(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbt.v16i1.9333

Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9

Siddiqui, F., YuSheng, K., & Tajeddini, K. (2023). The role of corporate governance and reputation in the disclosure of corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Heliyon, 9(5), e16055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16055

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Sugiarti Nida, R., Hasan, N., Shauki, E. R., & Diyanty, V. (2019). Firm maturity and corporate social responsibility: Using slack resources and gender composition as moderating variables. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Business and Economics Conference (APBEC 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/apbec-18.2019.30

Tang, S., & Demeritt, D. (2018). Climate change and mandatory carbon reporting: Impacts on business process and performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1985

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

Xiong, B., Ye, K., Skitmore, M., Jiang, W., & Qin, B. (2022). Chinese perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An analysis of annual reports in the housing sector. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(13), 2586–2597. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1811466

Yoon, B., Lee, J.-H., & Cho, J.-H. (2021). The effect of ESG performance on tax avoidance: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126729

Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Jia, M. (2023). How and when does mandatory CSR disclosure affect firms' CSR disclosure strategy? Management and Or

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Devani Heryaman Putri, Acep Komara, & Ahmad Syifaudin. (2026). Analysis of the Influence of Tax Burden and Profitability on CSR Disclosure with Good Corporate Governance Mediation. Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 4(4), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v4i4.5048