Pengaruh Penggunaan Internet terhadap Peningkatan Cybercrime di Indonesia pada Era Transformasi Digital Tahun 2015–2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v4i3.4599Keywords:
Cybercrime, Internet, Panel Cointegration, Panel ECM, PMG-ARDLAbstract
This study examines the extent to which internet adoption contributes to the escalation of cybercrime incidents across Indonesia from 2015 to 2024. The analysis employs a balanced panel dataset encompassing all 34 provinces of Indonesia, yielding 340 total observations. Two complementary estimation frameworks are applied in tandem: the Panel Error Correction Model (Panel ECM) with Fixed Effects estimation and the Pooled Mean Group-ARDL (PMG-ARDL) approach following Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (1999). A comprehensive battery of panel diagnostics is conducted, including unit root tests (LLC and IPS), cointegration tests (Pedroni and Kao), estimator selection via the Hausman test, and cross-sectional dependence detection using the Pesaran CD test. The results demonstrate that internet penetration exerts a statistically significant and positive long-run effect on cybercrime incidence, with the magnitude of this relationship substantially attenuated by educational attainment levels. The validity of the error correction mechanism is confirmed, indicating a stable convergence process toward long-run equilibrium. The theoretical underpinning draws on Becker's (1968) economics of crime framework: internet expansion systematically reduces the transaction costs associated with cyber offenses, broadens the pool of prospective targets, and elevates the expected utility calculation for potential offenders. Policy implications underscore the imperative of embedding digital literacy programmes within every internet infrastructure expansion initiative, with particular emphasis on provinces experiencing rapid connectivity growth yet exhibiting limited digital security capability.
References
Anderson, R., Barton, C., Bohme, R., Clayton, R., van Eeten, M., Levi, M., Moore, T., & Savage, S. (2019). Measuring the changing cost of cybercrime. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2019).
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2024). Laporan survei penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia 2015–2024. APJII.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Indeks pembangunan manusia provinsi 2015–2024. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Reserse Kriminal Polri. (2024). Statistik kriminalitas siber nasional 2015–2024. Divisi Humas Polri.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
Broadhurst, R., Grabosky, P., Alazab, M., & Chon, S. (2021). Organizations and cyber crime: An analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cyber crime. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 15(1), 1–20.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Kshetri, N. (2019a). Cybercrime and cybersecurity in Africa. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1603527
Kshetri, N. (2019b). The global cybercrime industry: Economic, institutional and strategic perspectives. Springer.
Moore, T., Clayton, R., & Anderson, R. (2009). The economics of online crime. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.3
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
Pratama, A. R., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Pemetaan risiko kejahatan siber di kota-kota besar Indonesia: Analisis geospasial dan ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 23(1), 45–68.
Rahmawati, D., & Kurniawan, H. (2022). Determinan cybercrime di Indonesia: Pendekatan data time series 2016–2021. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan, 7(2), 112–130.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Wall, D. S. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





