Spatial Inequality of Industrial Human Resources: A Composite LDGS Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v4i1.4313Keywords:
Industrial Human Resources, LDGS Index, North Kalimantan, Regional Competitiveness, Spatial InequalityAbstract
This study analyzes the spatial dynamics of industrial human resources in North Kalimantan Province. Using secondary data (2011–2022), it applies a Composite LDGS Index integrating Location Quotient, Dynamic LQ, Growth Rate Model, and Shift Share, complemented by Klassen Typology and Moran’s I–LISA spatial analysis. The findings reveal polarized industrial labor distribution, with Tarakan and Bulungan forming a high–high growth cluster, while Malinau and Tana Tidung remain low–low lagging regions. The results confirm that regional competitiveness and specialization dynamics, rather than growth alone, drive spatial inequality in industrial human resource development. Furthermore, infrastructure disparities, uneven investment flows, and differences in human capital quality contribute to the persistence of regional gaps. The study suggests that targeted regional policies, improved inter-district connectivity, and capacity-building programs are essential to reduce spatial inequality. Strengthening industrial linkages and promoting equitable development strategies are also crucial to enhance balanced growth across North Kalimantan Province and support long-term sustainable regional development outcomes.
References
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Arsyad, L. (1999). Pengantar perencanaan dan pembangunan ekonomi daerah (Vol. 1).
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. (2025). Angkatan kerja Provinsi Kalimantan Utara 2013–2022. BPS Kalimantan Utara
Blakely, E. J., & Leigh, N. G. (2010). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Glasson, J. (1990). Pengantar perencanaan regional. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Hendayana, R., Muda, P., Pengkajian, B., Pengembangan, D., & Pertanian, T. (2003). Aplikasi metode location quotient (LQ) dalam penentuan komoditas unggulan nasional. Informatika Pertanian, 12.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
Hoover, E. M., & Giarratani, F. (1984). An introduction to regional economics (3rd ed.). Alfred A. Knopf.
Kuncoro, M. (2004). Otonomi dan pembangunan daerah: Reformasi, perencanaan, strategi, dan peluang. Erlangga.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. Gerald Duckworth.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Putra, P. G. B. N., & Kartika, I. N. (2013). Analisis sektor-sektor potensial dalam menentukan prioritas pembangunan di Kabupaten Badung tahun 2001–2011.
Richardson, H. W. (1978). Regional and urban economics. Penguin Books.
Setiawan, R., Hatta, D., & Banyuriatiga. (2024). Daya saing sektor industri pengolahan kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Utara.
Sjafrizal. (2008). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi. Baduose Media.
Tarigan, R. (2005). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi.
Wibawa, J. C., & Zulfikar, R. (2017). Analisis dan pemetaan potensi daerah berbasis GIS dengan menggunakan metode MRP (Material Requirement Planning). Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.28932/jutisi.v3i3.693
Widodo, T. (2006). Perencanaan pembangunan: Aplikasi komputer (era otonomi daerah). UPP STIM YKPN.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
