Pengaruh Budaya Perusahaan Solid, Safe, Speed, Smart, Inovation (S4I) dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Semangat Kerja Karyawan Departemen Integrated Slab Yard di PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics

Authors

  • Muyasaroh Muyasaroh Universitas Al-khairiyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v3i1.3066

Keywords:

Corporate Culture, Leadership Style, Work Spirit

Abstract

ANDI FIRMANSYAH, NPM : 1902011093, “The Influence of Solid, Safe, Speed, Smart, Innovation (S4I) Corporate Culture and Leadership Style on the Work Spirit of Integrated Slab Yard Department Employees at PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics” thesis Management Study Program Faculty of Economics and Business Al-Khairiyah University under the guidance of Muyasaroh, S.E., Sy., M.E and M. Fulaisum Firdaus, S.E., M.M. 1). How does corporate culture (S4I) influence the work spirit of Integrated Slab Yard Department employees at PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics? 2) How does leadership style influence the work spirit of Integrated Slab Yard Department employees at PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics? 3) How does corporate culture (S4I) and leadership style influence the work spirit of Integrated Slab Yard Department employees at PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics?. This aims to determine the Influence of Solid, Safe, Speed, Smart, Innovation (S4I) Corporate Culture and Leadership Style on Employee Work Spirit in the Integrated Slab Yard Department at PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics, this study uses quantitative data by distributing questionnaires to respondents, namely Employees of PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics with a population study of 66 samples 66 with saturated sampling techniques. The reliability testing technique uses the Cronbach Alpha technique with hypothesis testing using the Person Product Moment correlation at a significant level of a = 5%. Based on data processing from SPSS version 25, the results of the analysis on the coefficient show that the r2 value is 0.621 and is stated in the strong category. The formula for the determination coefficient KD = r2 x 100% so that the determination coefficient value KD = 0.6212 X 100% = 38.5%. So it can be concluded that the variables X1 (Corporate Culture) and X2 (Leadership Style) and Y (Employee Work Spirit) have a relationship of 38.5 or rounded up to 38.5%.

References

Ahmad Qurtubi Ahmad. 2019 Perilaku Organisasi, Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing.

Edi Wahyudi Edi. 2019. hazard identficationi risk assessment dan risk control pada area cutting slab di PT. Krakatau argo logistics,skripsi, fakultas teknik universitas serang raya.

Hasibuan. 2020. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Kartono Kartini. 2020. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan : Apakah Kepemimpinan Abnormal itu. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Meithiana Indrasari. 2021. Karakteristik Sumber Daya Manusia Era Digital. (Perspektif Kepemimpinan, Motivasi, Dan Semangat Kerja). Sidoarjo Jawa Timur. Zifatama Jawara.

Nikmat Katarina Nikmat. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dan Perilaku Organisasi. Lombok. Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia.

Nurlailah. 2020. Pengantar Manajemen. Cipta Media Nusantara. Jakarta.

Rinawati. 2019. Pengantar Teori Manajemen Komunikasi dan Organisasi Yogyakarta: PT. Pustaka Baru.

Soesanto Heri. 2019. Pemimpin Menciptakan Budaya Unggul Generasi Milenial, PT Kanisius Depok.

Sugiono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Sunars Denok dan Vip Paramarta. 2021. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta barat. Cipta Media Nusantara.

Sutrisno Edy. 2019. Budaya Organisasi. jakarta: Prenada Media.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Muyasaroh Muyasaroh. (2025). Pengaruh Budaya Perusahaan Solid, Safe, Speed, Smart, Inovation (S4I) dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Semangat Kerja Karyawan Departemen Integrated Slab Yard di PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics. Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(1), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v3i1.3066