Eksistensi Bukti Digital Ephemeral Message dalam Pembuktian Pidana: Problematika Keabsahan Pembuktian pada Platform Pesan Instan

Authors

  • Yudhistira Prawira Utama Universitas 45 Surabaya
  • Marco Orias Universitas 45 Surabaya
  • Deki Satriawan Universitas 45 Surabaya
  • Hery Kurniawan Zaenal Universitas 45 Surabaya
  • Achmad Nurwachid Universitas 45 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58192/populer.v5i1.4410

Keywords:

Criminal Evidence, Digital Forensics, Electronic Systems, Ephemeral Message, ITE Law

Abstract

The development of instant messaging platforms equipped with ephemeral message features has created new challenges within Indonesia’s criminal evidence system, particularly regarding the admissibility and probative value of digital evidence that is automatically deleted and does not always leave verifiable forensic traces. The increasing use of such communication technologies raises legal concerns because digital information that disappears after a certain period may be relevant in criminal investigations and judicial proceedings. This condition creates legal uncertainty, as the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) do not explicitly regulate evidentiary standards for transient digital evidence. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of relevant primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that the admissibility of ephemeral message evidence largely depends on judicial interpretation and the availability of supporting derivative evidence, including screenshots, metadata, and digital forensic outputs. However, its evidentiary strength remains limited because such evidence often lacks complete authenticity, integrity, and traceability, which are essential elements in assessing the reliability of digital evidence. These limitations create juridical challenges throughout the criminal justice process, from investigation and prosecution to judicial examination and final judgment. Therefore, stronger regulatory frameworks, clearer legal standards, and more comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of digital evidence are needed to ensure legal certainty, consistency, and fairness in handling criminal cases involving ephemeral digital communications.

References

Al Mahdi, M. P. S., Ridwan, A., Ali, J., & Triadi, I. (2025). Rechtsvinding Di Era Digital: Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pertambangan. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 12(11), 4378-4388. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i11.2025.4378-4388

Anam, M. K. (2022). Eksistensi perundang-undangan terhadap digital forensik dalam sistem pembuktian pidana. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Anggraeni, D. R., & Salsabila, M. (2024). Analisis yuridis peran digital forensik dalam pembuktian tindak pidana di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12513470

Astuti, S. A. (2017). Perluasan Penggunaan Bukti Elektronik (Evidence of Electronic) Terkait Ketentuan Alat Bukti Sah atas Perbuatan Pidana di Ruang Mayantara (Cyberspace). Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 1(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v1i1.269

Billah, R. S., & Saragih, H. (2025). Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Tindak Pidana Siber (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 616/Pid. Sus/2023/Pn Jkt. Sel). Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 2739-2747. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1543

Cantika, G., Yunara, E., & Trisna, W. (2025). Kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap bukti elektronik: Antara eksistensi, hambatan penggunaan, dan urgensi pengaturannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Acta Law Journal, 3(2), 103-125.

Cayani, I. G. A. T., & Darma, I. M. W. (2025). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik melalui Media Sosial. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(5), 6915-6921. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2255

Faisal, N., Aswari, A., & Ilham, M. A. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Identitas di Era Digital. LEGAL DIALOGICA, 1(1), 1-19.

Hartono, M. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Penggunaan bukti elektronik dalam peradilan pidana. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23607

Harun, R. (2026). Implementation of the Use of Digital Evidence in Electronic Evidence in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Implementasi Penggunaan Digital Evidance pada Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pemasyarakatan dan Keadilan, 2(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.64272/xwfbzm28

Hasnawati, H., & Safrin, M. (2023). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2878

Isima, N. (2022). Kedudukan alat bukti elektronik dalam pembuktian perkara pidana. Gorontalo Law Review, 5(1), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i1.1999

Karo-Karo, R. P. P., & Widarto, B. (2026). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Digital dalam Pembuktiian Tindak Pidana Siber di Pengadilan Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(08), 1527-1538. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i08.2213

Mursyid, M., Putera, A., & Jannah, M. (2025). Rekonstruksi peran digital forensik dalam penyidikan tindak pidana siber: Analisis kritis terhadap konstruksi hukum pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v6i2.1194

Novianty, R. R., Saputra, D., & Ismainar, H. (2025). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Digital Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Anak. ANDREW Law Journal, 4(1), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.61876/alj.v4i1.57

Pahlawan, S. A. T. (2025). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(3), 708-719. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i3.1043

Ramadhan, G. (2025). Teknik Forensika Digital untuk Investigasi Pesan Sekali Lihat (View Once) pada Aplikasi Instant Messenger (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Safei, M., Dewi, S., & Johar, O. A. (2025). Implementasi Pada Alat Bukti Jejak Digital Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 8(2), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i2.2019

San Putra, T., Nugroho, S. S., & Chairani, M. A. (2026). Keabsahan Alat Bukti Digital dalam Pembuktian Kasus Phantom Hacker Scam. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3276

Wijayanti, N. K. S., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2025). Keabsahan Alat Bukti Chatting Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Proses Pemidanaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perzinahan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 7(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.22225/jah.7.1.2025.83-88

Wulandari, L. (2024). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities, 3(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.69503/retorika.v3i1.1572

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Yudhistira Prawira Utama, Marco Orias, Deki Satriawan, Hery Kurniawan Zaenal, & Achmad Nurwachid. (2026). Eksistensi Bukti Digital Ephemeral Message dalam Pembuktian Pidana: Problematika Keabsahan Pembuktian pada Platform Pesan Instan. Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa, 5(1), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.58192/populer.v5i1.4410