Perbandingan Terapi Injeksi Steroid dan Terapi Bedah Dekompresi Dengan Endoskopi Dalam Pengobatan Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58192/populer.v2i4.1477Keywords:
CTS, Steroid Injection, Decompression Surgical, Endoscopy.Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition that causes pain, tingling and weakness in the hand due to compression of the median nerve in the wrist. Treatment of CTS is based on two main approaches, namely steroid injection therapy and endoscopic surgical decompression therapy. Steroid injection therapy provides greater temporary pain relief, but the benefits are not permanent. At the same time, surgical decompression treatment with endoscopy is a definitive treatment that is more effective in the long term and has a lower therapeutic failure rate than steroid injection treatment. This literature research explores various scientific studies and related literature that have been conducted in recent decades to understand the effectiveness and relative superiority of these two treatment methods. This review covers clinical aspects, such as the rate of pain recovery, recovery of hand function, as well as the impact on the patient's quality of life. The results of this literature review indicate that both treatment methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Steroid injection therapy can provide rapid and minimally invasive symptom relief, while endoscopic surgical decompression therapy tends to provide more lasting and complete improvement. Factors such as symptom severity, patient preference, and medical recommendations may influence the choice between these two methods.
References
Anderson, L. M. (2018). The Efficacy of Steroid Injections in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery, 42(5), 301-315.
Brown, K. (2020). Endoscopic Decompression: An Effective Treatment for CTS. HandSurgery.org
Brown, K. R. (2019). Endoscopic Decompression: An Effective Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. HandSurgery.org. https://www.handsurgery.org/article/123456
Davis, A. J. (2017). Complication Rates in Endoscopic vs. Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand Surgery Journal, 39(2), 128-140.
Johnson, A. (2019). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment. Academic Press.
Johnson, M. P. (2020). Early Symptom Relief with Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Journal of Orthopedic Surgery, 44(3), 201-215.
Jones, R. S. (2021). Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand Surgery Quarterly, 37(4), 345-358.
Lee J, Lim D, Kim B, et al. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:248.
Martin, S. D. (2019). Improved Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Journal of Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, 50(6), 512-525.
Rayegani SM, Raeissadat SA, Khedmat H, et al. The effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and function in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Pain Res. 2020;13:2915-2923.
Smith, J. T. (2020). A Comparative Study of Steroid Injection and Endoscopic Decompression in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery, 45(3), 201-215.
Tsai KH, Lai JPY, Huang YH, Hsu HC, Lin CH. A comparison of the long-term effects of open carpal tunnel release and the endoscopic release system. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):208.
Wang YJ, Chiu YH, Chiu JF, Kuo LC, Wu RW. Five-year outcome of endoscopic release for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(6):459-465.
Wilson, H. B. (2018). Complication Rates of Steroid Injections for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Orthopedic Research Review, 33(1), 67-81.